Filed under: Law school, Personal, University | Tags: administrative law, admission of hearsay, adverse possession, agency workers, Andrew Alonzi, andrew bell, anglican, attempt, bioinformatics, blasphemy, book review, breach of contract, breach of duty, cambridge university press, Canada, Cavendish, civil liberties, civil litigation, community law, computer law, confession, constitutional law, copyright, covert, criminal attempts act, criminal justice act, criminal law, david salter, delict, different approach, discount, dishonesty, domestic law, duty of care, ECHR, effect of community law on domestic, employment law, english legal system, equity and trusts, equivocality theory, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, European Court of Justice, european union law, evidence, family law, fear, force, Gary Slapper, Gay News, gullefer, Hague Visby rules, Health Law, helen Fenwick, human rights, intellectual property, intellectual property law, International Law, international trade law, IP, ISP, Jain v Treant Strategic Health Authority, Jason Church, john snape, jurisdictions, jurisprudence, jury, jury instructions, knowledge, land law, Law school, libel, library, Limitation Act 1980, Lisa Mountford, M A Ramjohn, M E Rodgers, M J Dixon, Malcolm Shaw, Mark Van Hoorebeek, Mary Whitehouse, Mental Capacity Act, multiculturalism, natalie lee, negligence, nuisance, nursing home, Ofulue v Bossert, Open University, partnership, Patent Act, patenting software, permanent contract, procedural flaws, professional privilege, publication, publications for students, R v Cox and Railton, R v Y, real world details, reckless, refusing treatment, registration, removing babies at birth, revenue law, robbery, roderick bagshaw, Routledge, rule of law, sexual abuse, Stuart Toddington, stubbings v Webb, Student Law Review, subscription, Summer 08, surveillance, The Love that dares to speak its name, tim vollans, time off with illness, tort, treatment of victims, universalsim, witness
I dropped by my law school this week on the way to the library and picked up a copy of the current student law magazines while I was there.
The Student Law Review, published by Routledge Cavendish is a publication bordering on the “terrifyingly polished” and I find it to be a very interesting read that I try to pick up whenever I can.
I’ve done a quick and rough digest of the contents of this edition, and it’s a very, very long post so I’ve added it after the break. I will be back later to fact check but right now I’m just impressed at myself for getting this typed up. These are in no way the whole articles, or indeed perfect outlines of the articles themselves, I was more interested in putting out what the publication covers instead of violating the copyright on the articles themselves:
