<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law Lords move to Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scotslawstudent.com/2009/07/23/law-lords-move-to-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scotslawstudent.com/2009/07/23/law-lords-move-to-supreme-court/</link>
	<description>The SLS : Life and trials of learning law in Scotland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Smith</title>
		<link>http://scotslawstudent.com/2009/07/23/law-lords-move-to-supreme-court/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotslawstudent.com/?p=340#comment-123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That could be an idea...or we could just go the whole way and have massive constitutional reform with a written constitution, full seperation of powers and a full set of checks and balances to ensure that no one of the judiciary, executive and lesgislature is or can become too powerful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That could be an idea&#8230;or we could just go the whole way and have massive constitutional reform with a written constitution, full seperation of powers and a full set of checks and balances to ensure that no one of the judiciary, executive and lesgislature is or can become too powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotslawstudent</title>
		<link>http://scotslawstudent.com/2009/07/23/law-lords-move-to-supreme-court/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scotslawstudent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotslawstudent.com/?p=340#comment-122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is true and I think I might come to prefer &quot;The Supreme Court&quot; to &quot;The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords&quot; as a highest court.  Blackadder certainly ruined the Privy Council for me.

I quite like having senior judges reading Bills, so I hope they continue to analyse statute that&#039;s yet to be approved.  I believe it was Lord Hope who pointed out that issue with the Scotland Bill a few posts back so maybe separation of powers but also sending legislators on tougher statutory interpretation courses is the right twin course of action.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true and I think I might come to prefer &#8220;The Supreme Court&#8221; to &#8220;The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords&#8221; as a highest court.  Blackadder certainly ruined the Privy Council for me.</p>
<p>I quite like having senior judges reading Bills, so I hope they continue to analyse statute that&#8217;s yet to be approved.  I believe it was Lord Hope who pointed out that issue with the Scotland Bill a few posts back so maybe separation of powers but also sending legislators on tougher statutory interpretation courses is the right twin course of action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Smith</title>
		<link>http://scotslawstudent.com/2009/07/23/law-lords-move-to-supreme-court/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scotslawstudent.com/?p=340#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s really just a strengthening of the seperation of powers doctine, which is never a bad thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really just a strengthening of the seperation of powers doctine, which is never a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

